How to know when code is complex, Part 2: McCabe Complexity Metric
In my last post I discussed code complexity and the advantages of breaking complex code into smaller blocks. But how can we judge the size of these blocks? How can we quickly know the number of decisions in each block? If we think in terms of the delicate balance in a Calder Mobile, how do we ensure the blocks are similar in size and we get the “balance” that we need?
[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”] Source: Cyclomatic Complexity
This is where the McCabe Complexity Metric comes in. The Metric was laid out in an article by Thomas McCabe in December of 1976. It relates to the number of decision points (points where the logic path splits) in the section of code. So, for example, if we had 4 statements which moved data from one field to another and there are no decisions it, that section would get a score of 1. If we put in one decision then there would be two paths and it would be scored as 2. If one of the branches has a decision then there would be three paths, it would get a score of 3, and so on. This continues until you end up with, at times, pretty big numbers. Generally it’s best to keep each section of code at 10 or less. Ten is about the number you can keep in your brain – any more and the theory is you will get lost.
The McCabe Metric will help you find hidden knots of logic in your programs. We’ve all experienced them: areas in code that seem to be needlessly complex. They tend to be prone to error so developers will spend their most time in these area with analysis and debugging. To quickly spot the areas of greatest complexity, you may want to establish a threshold of 10, or a slightly higher number such as 15, and critically examine anything that rises above it. In the programs I have reviewed, most of a program is usually under 10, but a few areas are higher, and sometimes much higher.
When used along with the Halstead Metric, the McCabe Metric can help you objectively assess and compare the complexity of new programs and applications. By using a threshold you can focus on the areas of greatest complexity which can assist you in breaking them into smaller, more manageable, logical sections.
I’ll discuss some practical uses of the McCabe Complexity Metric in my next post.[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]
Latest posts by Mark Schettenhelm (see all)
- Why the Waterfall Development Methodology Has a Very Apt Name - April 17, 2018
- Mainframe and Distributed: Uniting an IT House Divided - February 13, 2018
- Waterfall to Agile SCM Conversion: Why Not Use the Best? - February 6, 2018